Perhaps the most enduring
appeal of “The Wizard of Oz” is its visual element. The costumes have become
iconic with copies of Dorothy’s blue pinafore dress and ruby slippers popping
up at fancy dress parties, drag shows, Pride parades, and just about everywhere
else. The actual costumes from the film fetch thousands of pounds at auction.
The famous ruby slippers
don’t appear in the book from which the film was based. Dorothy wore silver
shoes and the ruby ones were created to give a more visual impact on the colour
film. The decision to change them is credited to one of the film’s
screenwriters, Noel Langley. The slippers themselves, and their rediscovery
were the work of two gay men – costume designer Adrian (1903-1959) and costume
collector Kent Warner (1943-1984).
Because of their special
iconic status the ruby slippers are well covered on the internet with hundreds
of websites, blogs and videos dedicated to them alone. It would be pointless
for me to compete with them and write a definitive article. So here’s a brief look
at Adrian and Kent Warner.
Adrian (full name Adrian
Adolph Greenberg) was chief costume designer at MGM studios. He had been a
prolific designer since the days of silent film in 1925. Over 200 films have
Adrian’s name attached to them. Apart from “The Wizard of Oz” his most famous
films include “The Great Ziegfeld” (1936), “Pride and Prejudice” (1940) and
Hitchcock’s “Rope” (1948). The list of stars for whom Adrian designed dresses
and gowns reads like a Who’s Who of Hollywood greats – Greta Garbo, Joan
Crawford, Katherine Hepburn, Jean Harlow, and many others.
When commissioned for
the Oz film Adrian designed hundreds of individual costumes (over 100 for the
Munchkins alone), though he did “borrow” old costumes from previous projects.
The gown worn by Glinda, for instance, was originally created for Jeanette
MacDonald in the film “San Francisco” (1936).
Adrian’s original design
for the ruby slippers resembled Arabian shoes with curled up toes. These were
rejected because they looked too exotic on the feet of an ordinary girl from Kansas.
The red sequins, however, were kept for the subsequent slippers (of which at
least 5 different pairs are known to exist). One alteration, made by the gay
director George Cukor on his few days as director, was the addition of red bows.
I’ve just made a
throw-away remark about the number of ruby slippers that exist. As in modern
films and tv several identical costumes are made, some for stunt/body doubles,
others reserved in case of damage to the original. No-one knows for sure how
many ruby slippers were made, but if it wasn’t for Kent Warner only one pair
would exist today.
There may be more value
in having only one existing pair, but they have exerted such an influence over
costume collectors’ imaginations that they can still fetch thousands of dollars
at auction (the most recent pair went for over $666,000).
Two events occurred at
about the same time that meant the slippers gained a new significance.
The first was the
untimely death of Judy Garland in 1969. As with all famous stars her death saw
an increase in interest in everything about her. This was most notably so
within the gay community who had regarded Judy as one of their champions for
years, and her death is inextricably linked to the Stonewall Riots that
occurred the night after her death.
The second event was the
sale of MGM studios in 1970. Everything in storage was to be auctioned off –
sets, furniture, props and costumes. After the production of each film
everything was saved for future use in other films. In fact, only the mundane
objects were reused. Elaborate costumes and props hardly ever were used again
unless a sequel was made. The fantastic costumes of Oz were destined to remain
in storage, gathering dust and moths, until they disintegrated. In 1970 a huge
auction sale was arranged for all the items that were still in good shape, the
rest was junked. The man chosen to trawl through the costume stores and
catalogue everything for sale was Kent Warner.
Kent Warner has been a
fan of Adrian’s work since childhood and entered the film industry himself as a
costume designer. He had worked for MGM and other studios. He was also an avid
collector of film memorabilia, particularly costumes, for both his own
enjoyment and for profit. To this end he and his boyfriend Ron Wind often “took”
costumes that had been placed in storage for years (and in all probability
never to be used again). He also searched through rubbish bins and skips for
items that had been thrown away.
Over the years Kent
amassed a collection of many costumes from famous films. Knowing his keen
interest in historic film costumes the new MGM owners asked him to go through
their warehouses and stores. It must have been an Aladdin’s cave for him.
It is known that Kent
discovered at least 5 pairs of ruby slippers, including the Arabian pair (one
pair had been given as a competition prize in 1940 and was, until then, the
only pair known to exist). Kent kept a pair of slippers for himself and sold
several others. Only one pair was to be placed in the 1970 auction. With Judy
Garland’s death barely a year beforehand these slippers acquired a special
status – they didn’t even need to be labelled at the pre-auction viewing.
Whether there was a
deliberate attempt by the new MGM owners to bump up the value of the slippers
by only offering one pair for sale (as is likely) the anonymous buyer certainly
thought they were the only pair that existed.
You can find out the
fate of each pair of the existing ruby slippers by going online. Just google
“ruby slippers”.
Perhaps the world can
just about cope with 6 existing pairs of ruby slippers. Any more and their
value would lessen. In this year when we commemorate the 75th
anniversary of “The Wizard of Oz”, the 55th anniversary of the death
of Adrian, the 45th anniversary of the death of Judy Garland, and
the 30th anniversary of the death of Kent Warner, the ruby slippers
are still glowing with their own special magic.
I knew Ron, dated him for a time between '80 and '82. I found out about the "costume capers" from the horse's mouth, so to speak. After that, I didn't see him much.
ReplyDelete