Lgbt (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) history for everyone. No academic gobbledigook. No deep analysis. Just queer facts. There's still a lot of bigotry around but there's also lots to celebrate.
Today is the UK’s National
Poetry Day. To celebrate I’m going to look at a trio of black lgbt poets.
One of the most famous
black poets is Langston Hughes
(1902-1967). A leading figure in the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s and
‘30s Langston has become an icon of black American literature. He began writing
during his high school years in Ohio and later moved to Harlem, New York.
He was a prolific writer,
producing work in most literary genres right up to the time of his death. His
works concentrated on black American identity and issues of racism and economic
struggles. The issue of gay men in black society is just as important even if
he never mentioned it. Black American society could not accept that there were
gay black men in their community, so many, like Langston Hughes, hid it from
the wider community. Among his friends of the Harlem Renaissance, of whom there
were many openly lgbt black members, Langston’s sexuality was known and kept
private.
There have been few Poet
Laureate who have been lgbt and black. Only one has also been female, and that
is Audre Lorde (1934-1992), who was
officially appointed 3rd Poet Laureate of New York State in 1991.
Audre began writing poetry
before she was a teenager. Like Langston Hughes she wrote about black identity
in society. She also introduced discussion of lgbt identity into her work. She
wasn’t the first poet to do this but, added to her activism and advocacy of
discussion between the various identities, Audre believed a better society
would develop.
In 1968 Audre entered the
world of academia when she accepted the position of lecturer in creative
writing at City College, New York, and at the Herbert H. Lehman College. She
later became Associate Professor of English at the John Jay College of Criminal
Justice. Through these positions she was able to inspire and influence later
writers.
Following her death the
Audre Lorde Project was created to work with black community groups and
non-violent activism for lgbt African-Americans in New York.
More recent black lgbt
poets have embraced performance as part of their work. One of the most
well-known of these from the Washington DC area was Essex Hemphill (1957-1995).
Essex was at the
fore-front of what has been called the second Harlem Renaissance that began to
emerge. The work of gay black poets came to the attention of the wider public
in 1986 with the publication of “In the Life”, edited by Joseph Bean. Essex
Hemphill contributed to this anthology and edited the follow-up volume “Brother
to Brother: New Writings of Black Gay Men” in 1971.
But Essex is also
remembered for his performance and readings of his own poems. A charismatic
figure, Essex drew audiences to places as varied at small coffee houses to bit
theatres and gained an international reputation.
Writing poetry became a
means of refuge from his poor childhood. By retreating from this hardship he
empowered himself. His poetry readings, often accompanied by his performance
partner Wayson James, gave a confidence he never had as a youngster coping with
his sexuality in a homophobic society.
It’s sad that Essex’s life
coincided with the rise of the AIDS crisis. In some ways the crisis
overshadowed everything else in the lgbt community. Essex himself died of
AIDS-related causes at the height of his career. In recent years Essex Hemphill
has been recognised as one of the greatest gay black poets of the
post-Stonewall era. Most of his work, out of print for many years, is being
prepared for re-publication and the profile of Essex Hemphill will, hopefully,
resume itself in the world of black gay poetry as is did at his death.
However you celebrate
National Poetry Day search out more works by today’s Poet-Trio and discover for
yourself how their work is still very much poetry of our time.
If there’s one sin which
people admit to enjoying more than any other then surely it must be sex! But
for sex to be included on a list of sins there has to be some concept of which kind
of sex is considered acceptable and which kind isn’t. Every religion and
secular philosophy have laws and regulations on sex, and quite often they
contradict the others. In pre-Victorian times there was no problem in the UK
with having sex with girls as young as 12 because that was the age of consent.
Times, attitudes and morals have changed and today this would be classed as
child abuse and paedophilia.
And then there’s
pornography. Porn and sexual material has been referred to as being “blue” for
many decades. Historians have often debated why. Some claim it originates in
places like the Windmill Theatre where nude female models were bathed in blue
light. Others claim it originates in the English censorship of theatre
administered by the Lord Chamberlain’s Office where material deemed not
suitable for performance was crossed out of the script with a blue pencil.
None of the historians
bother looking further back. They know that red means anger and green means
envy, not realising that blue for sex originates in the same Medieval cultural
belief in western Europe. So, LUST, the excess of sex, is entered on my Seven
Deadly Gay Sins flag.
So, what can we talk about
today concerning the Deadly Sin of Lust in the lgbt community? Don’t get too
excited because I’m not going into gay porn!
We should never assume
that all lgbt heritage is about “good” people. One of the most constant
downsides of the lgbt community is the presence of those who practice the form
of lust currently considered the worst of them all – paedophilia.
There was a time when the
general public thought all gay men were paedophiles (some still do). This
opinion was brought into the open in my home city of Nottingham in August 1977.
The Campaign for
Homosexual Equality (CHE) held their annual conference in Nottingham. This was
the same conference at which the inspiration for the play “Bent” was premiered.
One of the guest speakers
at one of the workshops was a Dutch MP called Dr. Edward Brongersma
(1911-1998). As a member of the Dutch Senate he was instrumental in bringing
the homosexual age of consent down to 16 in line with heterosexual sex (he had
been imprisoned in 1950 after being convicted of having sex with a
17-year-old). What he is best known for, however, is his research into gay paedophilia.
He was considered a world authority on the subject. So when it was revealed he
would be attending the CHE conference in Nottingham there was a public outcry.
Protests were held outside
the hotel where the workshop he was scheduled to attend was to be held. The
hotel, fearful of losing business and of threats to the property, cancelled the
booking. The workshop was moved to another venue (just across the road from my
flat) and went ahead with Dr. Brongersma as the main guest. At the end of the workshop
he was given a standing ovation.
Attitudes in the UK
towards paedophilia at the time were, more often than not, not discussed
openly. Today there is more discussion about paedophilia and its moral place in
society. Child abuse in particular is a highly visible and almost constant
topic in the media.
The lgbt community must be
able to distinguish between paedophilia/child abuse and acceptable sexual
practices in modern society. There have been several articles in the lgbt media
this year about one man who has been hailed as a hero against Christian
homophobia, when in fact he was a serial child rapist and abuser. Is he the
sort of “hero” we want?
The man was brought to the
fore last year when plans were announced of Pope Francis’s visit to Uganda to
celebrate the 50th anniversary of the canonisation of the Ugandan
Martyrs. The visit never actually went ahead but the lgbt media voiced their
opposition all the same. The reason was because the Ugandan Martyrs were all
young Christian men and boys who were executed by their king, Mwanga II, after
they rejected his sexual advances. The visit was distorted into the Pope
appearing to honour Christians who rejected homosexuality. Which was the
greater sin – rejection of rape, or murder?
I gave a brief history of
their martyrdom several years ago. The whole point about the killings is not
that the Christian boys were being homophobic but that they were killed purely
because they rejected the forced sexual abuse of a paedophile and child rapist
who thought he had the right to rape who he pleased.
There was nothing good
about King Mwanga’s sexual activities. The Ugandan Martyrs weren’t even gay. He
used his power to abuse anyone he wished – gay, straight, male, female. This
was part of his culture and the Christian missionaries realised (even if modern
lgbt journalists don’t) that the human rights of Ugandans were being violated.
Forget the religion. Would an atheist organisation have supported this
violation? The fact that the boys were converted Christians is irrelevant. For
the first time in their lives someone had arrived and said they had the right
to say “No” to abuse.
For too many decades gay
men have been portrayed as predatory paedophiles like King Mwanga. It’s the
reason who so many people still oppose the idea of two gay men having children.
I weep when members of the lgbt community start using their own religious
prejudices to condone the rape of innocent boys. If I was murdered by a serial
rapist because I said “No” I hope I’d be remembered as a hero not the villain.
Have you ever kept a
scrapbook? I have. I’ve still got over a dozen of them I put together when I
was a teenager. I’ll be showing you two of them next year which I made 40 years
ago. Unknown to me at the time these scrapbooks have become an invaluable
record of the time I compiled them, something that can’t be reproduced in the
digital age.
More often than not
scrapbooks are thrown away. No-one thinks of them as significant to our
cultural heritage. They’re often thought of as just sentimental, nostalgic
items of no importance to anyone but their owners. But sometimes scrapbooks are
saved by those enthusiastic enough to keep adding to them year after year after
year.
One scrapbook compiler has
become one of the most important chroniclers of black American heritage,
without even having any academic background in history, and we’ll have a look
at his life and work today at the start of the UK’s Black History Month. His
name was L. S. Alexander Gumby (1885-1961).
Unlike my own scrapbooks,
which I never imagined would still be around 40 years later, Alexander Gumby
had the deliberate intention of making a permanent, ever-growing, and
long-lasting record. His scrapbooks were also more than just a hobby and a
collection of clippings, photos and ephemera that he found interesting. They
became his life. In today’s digital age he would surely have had a major
presence in the blogosphere and web universe.
Gumby began his first
scrapbook in 1901 when he was 16, about the same age I was when I started. The
subject of his first scrapbook was the recent assassination of President
McKinley, but soon his desire came to centre on a record of the lives of
African-American people and their contributions to American culture.
By 1904 he had left his
native Maryland and had moved to Harlem, New York. Arriving at a very
significant time in black American history, the early stages of the Harlem
Renaissance, Gumby found himself moving in the same circles as great Harlem
figures like Langston Hughes, Countee Cullen, and Josephine Baker.
Through the patronage of a
stockbroker called Charles W. Newman Gumby was able to expand his scrapbook
collection and house it in a studio in Harlem which soon became known as
“Gumby’s Bookstore”. This became an important gathering place for members of
the Harlem Renaissance and also the lgbt community (Gumby was gay), and all of
them helped to expand the scrapbook collection by donating photographs,
clippings and autographs. There Gumby hosted talks and meetings, displayed his
scrapbooks, and his flamboyant personality made his something of a must-meet
for visiting black Americans. He earned the nickname “The Great God Gumby”.
The Wall Street Crash of
1929 was a huge blow to Gumby’s stockbroker patron, and Gumby’s Bookshop closed
down. Everything was sold, except the precious scrapbooks which were stored in
a friend’s house.
Gumby continued to compile
scrapbooks. Every aspect of black culture and heritage was collected, from
slavery to sport (he compiled 7 scrapbooks on black boxers alone).
In 1950 he donated his
entire collection to Columbia University. They employed him to help organise
and catalogue the scrapbooks, which are now called the Alexander Gumby
Collection of Negroiana.
Gumby never stopped
collecting, right up to his death in 1961. In total he left 300 scrapbooks of
vital contemporary records of black Africa and historical documents dating back
to 1850. They leave a chronicle of black life that lives more than any book. We
can immerse ourselves in parts of those scrapbooks online at “Unwritten History: Alexander Gumby’s African America”.
Perhaps we should all
start our own scrapbooks. They would include all the things that can’t be put
on Twitter or Facebook, or whatever technological version of the world you
choose to live in.
For me, I stopped doing
scrapbooks over 20 years ago, but I still collect various personal ephemera
which are stored in boxes and envelopes. Is it time for a revival in the lost
art of scrapbooking? Thanks to Alexander Gumby we have something to inspire us.
Back in July I wrote about
lgbt drummers and briefly mentioned the jazz drummer Ruby Lucas. It seems
appropriate to write more about her today, during Black History Month UK and immediately
after my piece about the Harlem Renaissance.
Ruby Lucas was born and
raised during the Harlem Renaissance. She grew up in to become a member of a
small all-female jazz/swing band and, with the partner Tiny Davis, founded a
popular lesbian and gay bar in Chicago.
Much of what we know about
Ruby’s life comes from her position as Tiny Davis’s partner. There’s very
little information which tells us about Ruby as an individual in her own right.
Most of her story is told in relation to her place in Tiny’s life.
Ruby grew up in Kansas
City. Whether that is where she was born or not is uncertain. I’ve tried to
track her down on the US censuses for 1940 and 1930 without success, so I
cannot tell you the year of her birth or her family circumstances. It is almost
certain, though, that Ruby was raised in poor surroundings.
Ruby learnt to play the
piano as a youngster, and this leads me to suspect that there was music in her
family background. Perhaps her parents were musical entertainers of some sort
during the Harlem Renaissance years. Ruby’s musical talents were obviously
encouraged by someone and she also learnt to play the drums and bass.
As a performer Ruby used
the stage name Renei (or Renée) Phelan. I have seen a couple of references
which indicate it was the other way rough – Ruby being her stage name and Renée
her real name. I have also listened to interviews where Tiny Davis uses the
name Renée for Ruby which might be supportive of this. Again, a search of the
US census reveals nothing definite.
It was in Kansas City that
Ruby met Tiny. Ernestine “Tiny” Davis was a member of the International
Sweethearts of Rhythm, an all-female, inter-racial, jazz/blues/swing band which
toured America during World War II. Tiny was in Kansas City performing with the
Sweethearts in 1948 and was organising refreshments at the after-show party
when she met Ruby. There must have been an instant connection, because shortly
afterwards Tiny left her husband and children and lived with Ruby.
Soon after the war the
International Sweethearts disbanded and work for female black musicians was
difficult to find. Ruby not only became part of Tiny’s personal life after that
but also a member of a new all-female band called Tiny Davis and the Hell
Divers. This was a smaller band than the Sweethearts, just 3 or 4 members which
would find work in many more smaller venues than the dance hall. Tiny was band
leader and trumpet player and Ruby played the drums. The Hell Divers undertook
small tours of the US and Caribbean.
Ruby and Tiny moved from
Kansas City to Chicago shortly after forming the band. Tiny hinted in a 1988
documentary that they left Kansas because of their relationship (they were
“thrown out” of Kansas, in Tiny’s words).
In Chicago the Hell Divers
performed in clubs and bars, some of them gay and lesbian clubs. But tastes in
music were changing. The swing and jazz sounds of the 1930s and 1940s were
being replaced at the top of the music charts by rock’n’roll. With tour dates
diminishing Ruby and Tiny decided to open their own club in the early 50s,
“Tiny and Ruby’s Gay Spot” on Wentworth Avenue in Chicago. It soon became a
well-known venue for gays and lesbians to gather and hear Tiny and Ruby perform
live.
The Gay Spot could have
gone into the 1960s had it not been for the ubiquitous urban redevelopment in
many cities. In 1958 Tiny and Ruby’s Gay Spot was demolished to make way for a
new road, the Dan Ryan Expressway.
With their own venue gone
Ruby and Tiny returned to performing in other venues around Chicago. They had
acquired something of a cult following by then. In the end it was the progress
of time that stopped them performing. Tiny developed arthritis which prevented
her from standing for long periods on stage. Even so, it was 1982 when they
last performed professionally – that’s nearly 30 years after Tiny and Ruby’s
Gay Spot first opened.
In 1988 Ruby and Tiny were
featured in the documentary mentioned above, “Tiny and Ruby: Hell Divin’
Women”, in which they performed together and with Tiny’s family. This documentary
is featured on the DVD release of “Before Stonewall”.
Tiny Davis died in 1994.
Ruby Lucas survived her. Nothing is recorded of Ruby after this, perhaps
someone out there can let me know.
I’ll leave you with this
clip from the 1988 documentary.
Following on from my
article last Sunday on lgbt Renaissance composers here’s a look at a more
recent group of lgbt Renaissance musicians, those in the Harlem Renaissance of
the 1920s and 1930s.
It is something of a
misnomer to call the movement a true Renaissance. There was no consolidated or
focussed cultural or artistic past to be reborn, unlike the medieval
Renaissance which saw the rebirth of learning and art resulting from the rediscovery
of long forgotten and ignored Ancient Greek writings.
The Harlem Renaissance
began quietly and was a consolidation of many cultural influences from
African-American communities as they converged on New York City in what is
called the Great Migration at the end of the 19th century. The
consolidation of these influences began to be noticed in the 1920s when many
African-Americans began publishing their writings and new musical experiences
of modern cabaret, blues and jazz were being created.
When we look back at the
Harlem Renaissance we see many names emerging as pioneers of black American
culture. Many of these names are of women. But we must remember that the
culture of 1920s USA, even though it seems close to ours, was different. In her
recent undergraduate thesis “Women-Loving Women: Queering Black Urban Space
During the Harlem Renaissance” Samantha C. Tenorio points out that within the
black community of the period the term “women-loving women” “…implied a
particular intersectional identity of race, gender, sexuality, and often class,
due to the systemic impact of racism that produced wealth inequality, wherein
the woman-loving woman’s identity as a black, often working-class, woman of
non-normative sexuality located her at the lowest position of almost all social
hierarchies in the United States…” Today the contributions and influence of
women to the Harlem Renaissance is seen as equal to that of the men, but it
wasn’t thought so at the time.
The fact that the
majority of those involved were of the first generation of black Americans not
born into slavery is very important. Despite their lack of wealth and property
they were able to find a self expression which their parents and grandparents
never had.
This new self expression
included the freedom to meet and socialise in public. Nowhere can this be more
evident than in the music and entertainment venues whose influence spread
throughout the rest of the 20th century.
Jazz and the blues are
both seen as deriving from the music of the slaves and the southern states. The
blues continued the slave-music convention of expressing a desire and hope for
an improvement in the singer’s life. The desire to be free from slavery turned
into a desire to be happy, wealthy or accepted in society. Acceptance included
sexual orientation, and many of the famous female blues singers of the Harlem
Renaissance sang about same-sex acceptance.
No-one expressed this
same-sex acceptance in blues more openly than Gertrude “Ma” Rainey (1886-1939),
who is known as “the Mother of the Blues”. She was one of many female
performers who began their career on the American vaudeville stage of the
southern states. It was on that circuit that Rainey first heard the blues.
Using influences from both southern country and northern urban sounds Rainey
developed the blues into a medium which became popular with all audiences and
became commercial enough for record producers to start marketing the blues to
Americans of all heritages and social groups.
Sexuality was a large
element in both Rainey’s performance and lyrics, using this in her most
well-known song, “Prove It On Me Blues” in which she challenges the listener to
catch her with anther woman. It was performed with a knowing look, and it is
generally accepted that Rainey was indeed bisexual.
During a tour of
Tennessee another influential blues singer joined Ma Rainey’s show. She was the
“Empress of the Blues”, Bessie Smith (1894-1937). To say Bessie led a colourful
life is an understatement. Hers is also a genuine “rags to riches” story of how
a woman from a poor black family used her talents to amass wealth. Most of this
was achieved through a recording contract. In 1923 Bessie’s recording of
“Down-Hearted Blues” sold over three quarters of a million copies in America in
6 months.
Bessie’s private life
was hardly private at all. She never his her tempestuous, sometimes violent,
temper, nor her sexual preferences for both men and women. She led the sort of
life to which legends attached themselves, though one story may be true. It is
said that she once shouted at a female lover that she had 12 women in her show
and she could sleep with one every night if she wanted.
Bessie’s untimely death,
like so many others of legendary performers, is also surrounded by legend. The
plain truth is that she died from injuries she sustained in a car accident in
1937 at the age of 43.
From these influential
pioneers, and from other female performers of the Harlem Renaissance, blues and jazz
disseminated across the whole of American society and established itself as a
timeless genre which still has many fans and performers to this day.