For up-to-date information
on the opening day of Tokyo 2020 go here.
There’s only just over a
year until the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games kicks of with the lighting of the
Olympic flame at Olympia on 15th March 2020. Here are my updated lgbt Olympian
lists. I had hoped to come up with a new format but haven’t had time to come up
with one. Hopefully I will by next year.
The number of lgbt Olympians still grows. On average I add 2 new names every month.
Below are the new lists. I have split the Summer and Winter games into separate lists. The Winter list also includes the known lgbt athletes who competed in Olympic trials and qualifying tournaments, plus a handful of coaches, judges and officials.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10e6OsTkESee3vmHASoHtrCeaeLJUW2-r/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yqp69ce-Pzt7vxB8Nx5UcCtSVwJkNr-i/view?usp=sharing
One of the exciting prospects for Tokyo 2020 is that there could be the high probability that there will be 100 out lgbt Olympians at the same games for the first time. It is also likely, given past experience, at least 2 athletes will come out during those games.
While it is still a concern to many that there are two few openly lgbt Olympians it may be encouraging to know that there is a large number who compete in trials and qualifying tournaments who don’t perform quite good enough to be selected for their national team. To illustrate this I’ve produced the table below in which I show the total number of known lgbt athletes who aspire to Olympic selection against those who succeed.
Records of which events are official qualifying events are difficult to determine prior to 1948 so the table only includes statistics from the 1956 Melbourne Summer Olympics onwards where events are specifically designated as an Olympic qualification event. I’ve not included the 1980 Moscow Olympics because of the boycott by many athletes making it even more difficult to determine who would have been there.
Bear in mind that the number in the Trials column are those who competed in trials and qualifying events but were not selected for the Olympics. For the complete total of lgbt athletes just add the Trials and Olympics figures together. For example, 6 lgbt athletes competed in the trials, etc., for the 1956 Melbourne games but only 3 were selected and competed at the games while 3 weren't.
Looking at the figures there are some interesting conclusions to make. First of all, we can see that the number of lgbt athletes has already exceeded 100 if we take into account those who competed in trials, with London 2012 taking us to 109. Secondly we have to rake into account that the number of athletes of all sexualities vastly outnumbers the one who made it onto their national Olympic team. In sports such as swimming or track and field there could be hundreds of competitors in the national trials, particularly in the USA, and only 3 spaces available for the same Olympic event.
This in itself gives us a more optimistic overview of lgbt athletes. Look at the figures for the 1976 Innsbruck Winter Games. There were only 4 known lgbt athletes at the games, all of whom competed in the trials. That’s a 100% success rate, however small the number.
In terms of success it is gratifying to know that in most cases the number of lgbt athletes who competed at an Olympic games outnumbers the lgbt athletes who didn’t. But don’t forget, the same is true with non-lgbt athletes.
If we need to decide which Olympics can be considered as the best with regard to lgbt conclusion (in terms of numbers rather than percentage) then it has to be Sydney 2000. Of the 71 known athletes who competed in the trials and qualifiers only 7 didn’t make it to Sydney. That’s a lower number but a higher percentage than either London 2012 or Rio 2016 where over 100 competed in trials.
If you study the figures more closely I’m sure you’ll find something that reveals positive trends that are hidden underneath the official Olympic numbers.
I hope you find these tables and charts of interest, and bear in mind that ongoing research could easily make them out of date within a month!
That’s it for LGBT History Month UK. I’ll be back in April with another month of lgbt heritage, which will include an article to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the Mr. Gay World contest, the 600th anniversary of the death of Leonardo da Vince, and a look at one of the darkest and most far-reaching legacies that a member of the lgbt community has ever produced.
The number of lgbt Olympians still grows. On average I add 2 new names every month.
Below are the new lists. I have split the Summer and Winter games into separate lists. The Winter list also includes the known lgbt athletes who competed in Olympic trials and qualifying tournaments, plus a handful of coaches, judges and officials.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10e6OsTkESee3vmHASoHtrCeaeLJUW2-r/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yqp69ce-Pzt7vxB8Nx5UcCtSVwJkNr-i/view?usp=sharing
One of the exciting prospects for Tokyo 2020 is that there could be the high probability that there will be 100 out lgbt Olympians at the same games for the first time. It is also likely, given past experience, at least 2 athletes will come out during those games.
While it is still a concern to many that there are two few openly lgbt Olympians it may be encouraging to know that there is a large number who compete in trials and qualifying tournaments who don’t perform quite good enough to be selected for their national team. To illustrate this I’ve produced the table below in which I show the total number of known lgbt athletes who aspire to Olympic selection against those who succeed.
Records of which events are official qualifying events are difficult to determine prior to 1948 so the table only includes statistics from the 1956 Melbourne Summer Olympics onwards where events are specifically designated as an Olympic qualification event. I’ve not included the 1980 Moscow Olympics because of the boycott by many athletes making it even more difficult to determine who would have been there.
Bear in mind that the number in the Trials column are those who competed in trials and qualifying events but were not selected for the Olympics. For the complete total of lgbt athletes just add the Trials and Olympics figures together. For example, 6 lgbt athletes competed in the trials, etc., for the 1956 Melbourne games but only 3 were selected and competed at the games while 3 weren't.
Season
|
Games
|
Trials
|
Olympics
|
Total
|
Summer
|
1956 Melbourne
|
3
|
3
|
6
|
Winter
|
1964 Innsbruck
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
winter
|
1968 Grenoble
|
5
|
2
|
7
|
summer
|
1968 Mexico City
|
1
|
6
|
7
|
winter
|
1972 Sapporo
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
summer
|
1972 Munich
|
2
|
6
|
8
|
winter
|
1976 Innsbruck
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
summer
|
1976 Montréal
|
2
|
10
|
12
|
winter
|
1980 Lake Placid
|
2
|
3
|
5
|
winter
|
1984 Sarajevo
|
8
|
6
|
14
|
summer
|
1984 Los Angeles
|
4
|
13
|
17
|
winter
|
1988 Calgary
|
6
|
9
|
15
|
summer
|
1988 Seoul
|
1
|
22
|
23
|
winter
|
1992 Albertville
|
5
|
5
|
10
|
summer
|
1992 Barcelona
|
3
|
21
|
24
|
winter
|
1994 Lillehammer
|
7
|
5
|
12
|
summer
|
1996 Atlanta
|
8
|
27
|
35
|
winter
|
1998 Nagano
|
17
|
9
|
26
|
summer
|
2000 Sydney
|
7
|
64
|
71
|
winter
|
2002 Salt Lake City
|
15
|
14
|
29
|
summer
|
2004 Athens
|
9
|
46
|
55
|
winter
|
2006 Turin
|
20
|
21
|
41
|
summer
|
2008 Beijing
|
24
|
64
|
88
|
winter
|
2010 Vancouver
|
14
|
26
|
40
|
summer
|
2012 London
|
35
|
74
|
109
|
winter
|
2014 Sochi
|
15
|
26
|
41
|
summer
|
2016 Rio de Janeiro
|
39
|
84
|
123
|
winter
|
2018 PyeongChang
|
10
|
18
|
28
|
Looking at the figures there are some interesting conclusions to make. First of all, we can see that the number of lgbt athletes has already exceeded 100 if we take into account those who competed in trials, with London 2012 taking us to 109. Secondly we have to rake into account that the number of athletes of all sexualities vastly outnumbers the one who made it onto their national Olympic team. In sports such as swimming or track and field there could be hundreds of competitors in the national trials, particularly in the USA, and only 3 spaces available for the same Olympic event.
This in itself gives us a more optimistic overview of lgbt athletes. Look at the figures for the 1976 Innsbruck Winter Games. There were only 4 known lgbt athletes at the games, all of whom competed in the trials. That’s a 100% success rate, however small the number.
In terms of success it is gratifying to know that in most cases the number of lgbt athletes who competed at an Olympic games outnumbers the lgbt athletes who didn’t. But don’t forget, the same is true with non-lgbt athletes.
If we need to decide which Olympics can be considered as the best with regard to lgbt conclusion (in terms of numbers rather than percentage) then it has to be Sydney 2000. Of the 71 known athletes who competed in the trials and qualifiers only 7 didn’t make it to Sydney. That’s a lower number but a higher percentage than either London 2012 or Rio 2016 where over 100 competed in trials.
If you study the figures more closely I’m sure you’ll find something that reveals positive trends that are hidden underneath the official Olympic numbers.
I hope you find these tables and charts of interest, and bear in mind that ongoing research could easily make them out of date within a month!
That’s it for LGBT History Month UK. I’ll be back in April with another month of lgbt heritage, which will include an article to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the Mr. Gay World contest, the 600th anniversary of the death of Leonardo da Vince, and a look at one of the darkest and most far-reaching legacies that a member of the lgbt community has ever produced.